In a few hundred years, when the history of our time will be written from a long-term perspective, it is likely that the most important event historians will see is not technology, not the Internet, not e-commerce. It is an unprecedented change in the human condition. For the first time—literally—substantial and rapidly growing numbers of people have choices. For the first time, they will have to manage themselves. And society is totally unprepared for it.
~ Peter Drucker
slip:4a760.
People who become engaged with movement in the found environment develop a new way of seeing their environment. Well, t e c h n i c a l l y , they recover a way of seeing their environment which they lost. Mountains, hills, water, stairs… and the moats that criss-cross our communities where the big metal and plastic boxes whiz along— these all become “challenging.” Walls (of various heights from knee to enormous), railings, painted lines— these all become “challenging.” And yet, I’ve had the pleasure on countless occasions to stumble into a built space which feels different. Spaces which don’t require me to see differently. Spaces which beckon me to sit, stand, move, climb, and play.
That we immediately switch to building our cities and countries around people, instead of cars.
~ Peter Adeney from, Less Cars, More Money: My Visit to the City of the Future
slip:4umoca1.
Cars (small trucks, commercial trucks, planes, trains and ships) are tools. As I’ve said before what really matters about tools is one’s thinking and choices about tools. What I rarely hear mentioned is that tool choices also affect us. Our use of tools changes us. That’s what I really care about. How am I enabled (to do other things, to live more fully, etc), or constrained, by my choices with respect to tools? Furthermore, how do my choices enable or constrain those close to me? …in my community? …country? …world?
ɕ
What unique experiences and challenges have shaped the transition of an indie author into podcasting?
An author navigates the intersection of creativity, technology, and self-promotion through podcasting.
What I realized was I needed to choose myself. Because there wasn’t anybody out there who was going to take a chance on me.
~ Annie Parnell (20:20)
The conversation focuses on the journey of an indie author who specializes in historical romantic suspense with a feminist perspective, as she ventures into podcasting. Annie shares the challenges of creating audiobooks independently and how those obstacles motivated her to adapt her storytelling into a podcast format. Her process is shaped by creative choices, such as incorporating Foley sound effects and dramatizing her narratives while recording.
A significant theme is the balance between self-reliance and community support. Annie discusses her reliance on feedback from a launch team and her willingness to share imperfections in her work. Additionally, she touches on broader cultural topics, such as fostering sisterhood and challenging adversarial narratives through her novels. These values influence both her writing and her decision to make her work more accessible through audio formats.
Takeaways
Creative adaptations — Transforming a book into a podcast allows for a unique storytelling format.
Technological challenges — Podcasting requires managing tools and technology, such as sound effects and recording setups.
Generosity in storytelling — Sharing creative work, even when imperfect, can foster stronger audience connections.
Themes of sisterhood — Promoting collaboration and support among women is central to the author’s work.
Self-reliance in publishing — Choosing to self-publish empowers authors who are overlooked by traditional channels.
Audience engagement — A private Facebook group supports the author’s promotional efforts and gathers feedback.
Learning from mistakes — Accepting and sharing errors is seen as a valuable growth opportunity.
Resources
Annie Parnell’s web site — Includes free short stories and information about her work.
“The Reluctant Countess” — First book in the author’s series, focusing on sisterhood and historical themes.
“Do No Harm” — A short story available as a free download on her website.
(Written with help from Chat-GPT.)
ɕ
[C]hange does not take technology, it takes courage. And, this is why change is not a commodity. Change is not easy nor is it formulaic. But I can say this with the utmost conviction, change is inevitable and it is yours to define.
~ Brian Solis, from «https://www.gapingvoid.com/blog/2012/03/28/it-takes-courage/»
slip:4ugabo15.
If you want to affect change you must first understand which sorts of changes are difficult and why.
On the one hand, things change all the time. A great definition of “old age” is when you begin to lament the inevitable changes to the specific things you prefer in your supermarket. On the other hand, affecting a change that you desire feels extremely difficult. (Go try to bring back your favorite brand of mustard after the manufacturer has discontinued it.)
On the one hand, there’s a huge array of things I can change easily: My shirt, the book I’m reading, and the lane I’m driving in. On the other hand I quite honestly struggle changing my physical body, my bad habits, and my addictions.
On the one hand, changing thousands of minds at once is easy: Give me a few orange cones and I can make everyone change their mind about always driving on the correct side of the road. On the other hand, it seems impossible to get people to do the correct thing, when they are waiting to turn left at a two-way stop sign, and I arrive opposite them intending to go straight.
On the one hand, millions of people have been convinced to spend their time on social networks. On the other hand, try convincing just one of them to disconnect.
Sometimes a piece of technology is enough to change everything and everyone. Sometimes no piece of technology seems powerful enough to get it done. Sometimes a tiny idea spreads like wildfire, and sometimes the mindless mob wins. Sometimes people are swayed by emotion, and sometimes they make choices based on logic. Sometimes change is objectively good, sometimes it’s objectively bad, and sometimes it seems too complicated to decide.
The important question is: What sort of change do you want to attempt?
ɕ